Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92968 (PAT)

Jitendra Paswan v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./68842/2025 · 2025-12-09

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67789 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2025 Thana- UPHARA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ranjeet Paswan S/o Laldeo Paswan R/o Village- Khaira, P.S.- Uphara, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 68842 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2025 Thana- UPHARA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1. Jitendra Paswan Son of Late Kalpu Paswan R/o Village - Khaira, P.S. - Uphara, Dist. - Aurangabad. 2. Satyendra Paswan Son of Late Kalpu Paswan R/o Village - Khaira, P.S. - Uphara, Dist. - Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 67789 of 2025) For the Petitioner : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP For the Informant : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 68842 of 2025) For the Petitioners : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 09-12-2025 Heard learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67789 of 2025(4) dt.09-12-2025 2/2 2. After some arguments, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw these anticipatory bail applications. 3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded. 4. Accordingly, these anticipatory bail applications stands dismissed as withdrawn. 5. However, if the petitioners surrender within a period of eight weeks from today before the learned trial Court and pray for regular bail, the same shall be considered on merits, without being prejudiced by this order. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T