HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7547 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Sri Tarun Kedar Nath Singh, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of informant. The same are taken on record. 2. Heard counsel for the applicant, counsel for the informant, Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record. 3. The present application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 111 of 2025, under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 74, 109(1), Police Station- Sarai Mamrej, District- Prayagraj. 4. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the first information report, fifteen named accused including the applicant are alleged to have assaulted Shubham, Nand Lal and Raju. As per the medical report as well as x-ray report of Shubham and Nand Lal, the injuries received by them were simple in nature. The injured Raju received three injuries which were referred for x- ray examination. As per the x-ray report the injury nos. 1 and 3 were found simple in nature whereas the injury no. 2 was fracture of nasal bone. It is contended that although the injury no. 2 of Raju was grievous in nature but not dangerous to life. A vague and general role has been assigned to the applicant. The applicant has not been nominated as the principal offender who caused the injury no. 2 to the injured Raju. It is next contended that the applicant did not act inappropriately with the victim. The criminal history of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramji Rakesh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) the applicant has been explained in para no. 30 of the affidavit. The investigation is still pending. It is next submitted that the applicant has apprehension of his arrest and in case, the applicant is released on anticipatory bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 5. Learned A.G.A. and counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and the fact a vague and general role has been assigned to the applicant, the applicant has not been nominated as the principal offender who caused the injury no. 2 to the injured Raju, at this stage, there is no substantive evidence against the applicant, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicant Ramji Rakesh, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer during investigation and shall report to the Investigating Officer as and when required for the purpose of conducting investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country during the currency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court. (iv) The applicant shall surrender his passport, if any, to the concerned Court forthwith. His passport will remain in custody of the concerned Court. (v) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek NABAIL No. 7547 of 2025 2 any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. (vi) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of B.N.S.S. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 9. The application stands disposed of. September 16, 2025 Sachin Mishra NABAIL No. 7547 of 2025 3 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad