Sreeram Dileep Kumar, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/6174/2020 · 2025-09-11
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9296 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9296 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010102822020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6174/2020 Between:
1. SREERAM DILEEP KUMAR,S/O.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, HINDU, MALE, AGED. 46 YRS, R/O.D.NO.7A-9-53, MAIN BAZAR, ELURU-1, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ELURU.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, I-TOWN POLICE STATION, ELURU. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.,
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I-TOWN POLICE STATION, ELURU. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.,
6. KANIGOLLA VENKATA NAGA SATYA RAMA MALLIKARJUNA RAO, S/O.LATE BHASKARA RAO, HINDU, MALE, AGED. 55 YRS, R/O.D.NO.6B-1-15, SANGAPAPPU BAZAR, OPP.PANTHULURU GARI SHOP, SOUTHERN STREET, ELURU-1. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.,
7. KANIGOLLA SATYA VANI, W/O. VENKATA NAGA SATYA RAMA MALLIKARJUNA RAO,
HINDU, MALE, AGED. 51 YRS, R/O.D.NO.6B-1-15, SANGAPAPPU BAZAR, OPP.PANTHULURU GARI SHOP, SOUTHERN STREET, ELURU-1. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.,
8. KANIGOLLA BHASKARA MANIKANTA, S/O. VENKATA NAGA SATYA RAMA MALLIKARJUNA RAO, HINDU, MALE, AGED. 31 YRS, R/O.D.NO.6B-1-15, SANGAPAPPU BAZAR, OPP.PANTHULURU GARI SHOP, SOUTHERN STREET, ELURU-
1. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.,
2
9. MADDU SAI RANI, W/O.VISHNU VARDHAN RAO, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED. 49 YRS, R/O.D.NO.36-18-8, SOUTHERN STREET, KANDAKAM ROAD, ELURU. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, to declaring the inaction of the official respondents 2 to 5 in not considering petitioner's representation dt.26.2.2020 with regard to the illegal and highhanded activities of the un- official respondents 6 to 9 in respect of the shop situated in Main Bazar, Eluru, West Godavari District., is quite illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequentially to direct the respondent police to take necessary action against the un-official respondents 6 to 9 in pursuance of the complaint made by petitioner, in connection with the shop situated in Main Bazar, Eluru, West Godavari District., and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MANCHANAPALLI SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“.... to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, to declaring the inaction of the official respondents 2 to 5 in not considering petitioner's representation dt.26.2.2020 with regard to the illegal and highhanded activities of the un-official respondents 6 to 9 in respect of the shop situated in Main Bazar, Eluru, West Godavari District, is quite illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequentially to direct the respondent police to take necessary action against the un-official respondents 6 to 9 in pursuance of the complaint made by petitioner, in connection with the shop situated in Main Bazar, Eluru, West Godavari District., and pass ...”
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that as per the contents of the complaint of the Petitioner, there
3
are civil disputes pending between the Petitioner and others which is the subject matter pending before the competent Civil Court and would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition.
None represented for the Petitioner.
In the light of the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No
order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 6174 of 2020
12.09.2025
Mjl /*