Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9295 (JK)

MOHAMMAD AFZAL RESHI(DECEASED) THROUGH HIS SON v. MR.ATUL DULLOO (P.W.D) AND ORS

CCP(D)/62/2024 · 2025-03-14

Atul Sreedharan, Puneet Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 29 Suppl. Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(D) 62/2024 in[LPA 121/2023] MOHAMMAD AFZAL RESHI … Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Irfan Andleeb, Advocate Vs. MR.ATUL DULLOO (P.W.D) AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Abdul Rashid Malik, Sr. AAG & Mr. Mohammad Younis, Assisting Counsel CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL SREEDHARAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE ORDER 14.03.2025 Pursuant to the last order passed by this Court on 12.03.2025, learned counsel for the contemnors had informed this Court that there has been substantive compliance in letter and spirit. There was a statement that was recorded on behalf of the contemnors to the effect in paragraph 03 of the order above-mentioned wherein it was recorded that the Minister concerned is busy on account of the ongoing Assembly Session and, therefore, would take him time to sign the file. Upon clarification given by the learned counsel for the contemnors, the said statement was made on account of error in appreciating the instructions given by the Government. Same stands redacted. Learned counsel for the contemnors has also informed that the entire amount of Rs. 41,29,000/- (Rupees Forty One Lacs and Twenty Nine Thousand Only) has been deposited in the account of Registrar Judicial of this Court in the Account No. 048040100000198. Upon an application moved by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Registrar Judicial of this Court is requested to release the said amount in favour of the petitioner. Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 17.03.2025 In view of the above, the order stands complied with. The contempt proceedings are, accordingly, closed. However, any observation made by this Court which is negative to any of the parties shall deem to have been redacted. (PUNEET GUPTA) (ATUL SREEDHARAN) JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR: 14.03.2025 “Mir Arif” Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 17.03.2025