Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9295 (GAU)

SHYAMAL CH. ROY and 27 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS.

WP(C)/7576/2017 · 2025-10-21

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/5 GAHC010055182017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7576/2017 SHYAMAL CH. ROY and 27 ORS. S/O BISHAD CH. ROY VILL- JHAPUSABARI PART-V P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM 2: HABIBAR RAHMAN BEPARI S/O BAHAR UDDIN BEPARI VILL- JHASKAL PART-III P.O. JHASKAL DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 3: SRI TAPAN CHAKRABORTY S/O HIMANGSU MOHAN CHAKRABORTY VILL- JHASKAL PART-II P.O. JHASKAL DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 4: ANOWAR HUSSAIN BEPARI S/O LT. ALI UDDIN BEPARI VILL- JHAPU JHAPUSABARI PART-IV P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 5: SMTI. BINAPARI ADHIKARY W/O LT. KANAK CH. ADHIKARY VILL- JHAPUSABARI PART-I P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 6: SHIBENDRA NATH ROY S/O LT. PIARY MOHAN ROY VILL- PABRCHARA P.O. PABARCHARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 7: SUSHIL CH. ROY S/O LT. GOVINDA CH. ROY VILL- JHAPUSABARI PART-V P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM Page No.# 2/5 8: BAZAR ALI AHMED S/O MAHIR UDDIN BEPARI VILL- BHAMUNDANGA PART-II P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 9: MD. MINARUL HOQUE S/O MOZIBUR RAHMAN VILL- JHAPUSABARI PART-III P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 10: MASIR UDDIN SHEIKH S/O MD. TUNU SHEIKH VILL- KHERBARI PART-IV P.O. KHERBARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 11: AYSHA KHATUN W/O JAHEDUR ALI AHMED VILL- SUPARIKUTI P.O. JHAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 12: AJAHAR ALI BEPARI S/O KARIMULLA BEPARI VILL- BHAMUNDANGA P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 13: SMTI. MAMATA DAS W/O ABILASH DAS VILL- RAMRAYKUTI PART-I P.O. SATRASAL DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 14: AMERENDRA RAY S/O TAZENDRA NATH RAY VILL- RAMRAYKUTI PART-II P.O. SATRASAL DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 15: ABDUL MANNAF S/OLT. KARIMULLA SHEIKH VILL- JHASKAL PART-I P.O. JHASKAL DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 16: SMTI. PARUL BALA SEN W/O MONA MOHAN SEN VILL- PABARCHARA P.O. PABARCHARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 17: FULESWARI RAY W/O BIMAL CH. RAY VILL- JHASKAL PART-I P.O. JHASKAL DIST. DHUBRI Page No.# 3/5 ASSAM 18: ANIL CHANDRA ROY S/O SRI PUNNA CH. ROY VILL- PABARCHARA P.O. PABARCHARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 19: MAZIBAR RAHMAN S/O LT. AMIR UDDIN BEPARI VILL- BHAMUNDANGA PART-III P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 20: GAHER ALI BEPARI S/O MANSUR ALI BEPARI VILL- JHAPUSABARI PART-II P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 21: MASIR UDDIN BEPARI S/O LT. BAYTULLA BEPARI VILL- JHAPUSABARI PART-IV P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 22: SMTI. SWAPNA DAS W/O GIRANDRA NATH DAS VILL- SATRASAL P.O. SATRASAL DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 23: GOLJAN KHATUN SARKAR W/O GOLAM HUSSAIN SARKAR VILL- JHAPUSABARI PART-III P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 24: KHORSHEDA SOBHANI W/O NOBEL SARKAR VILL- BHAMUNDANGA PART-I P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 25: ABDUL AZIZ MIAH S/O AHED SHEIKH VILL- JHAPUSABARI PART-III P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 26: NAZRUL HOQUE S/O MAKBUL HOQUE VILL- RAMRAYKUTI PART-I P.O. SATRASAL DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM Page No.# 4/5 27: ABDUL MAZID SARKAR S/O LT. KERAMAT ALI VILL- BHAMUNDANGA PART-I P.O. JAPUSABARI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 28: SADIKUR RAHMAN S/O ABDUL JALIL SHEIKH VILL- RMRAYKUTI PART-I P.O. SATRASAL DIST. DHUBRI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, FOOD andCIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI - 781006. 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DHUBRI P.O. and DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN - 783324. 3:THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FOOD and CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT DHUBRI P.O. and DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN - 783324. 4:THE SATRASAL SAMABAY SAMITTEE LTD. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY VILL and P.O. SATRASAL DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN - 783335 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.E HUSSAIN, MR.D A KAIYUM,MRJ RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : , GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER Page No.# 5/5 22.10.2025 Perused the order dated 11.09.2025 of the learned Lawazima Court requiring the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of notice upon the respondent no. 4. Shri DA Kaiyum, learned counsel for the petitioners has however submitted that in view of the interim order regarding Court Fee, there may not be any surviving cause of action. Also heard Shri N. Das, learned State Counsel. In view of the aforesaid position, the writ petition is closed. It is needless to state that in case any cause of action arises, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court. JUDGE Comparing Assistant