Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92938 (PNJ)

RAJIV v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/24290/2025 · 2025-08-21

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-24290-2025 (O&M). -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 128 CWP-24290-2025 (O&M). Date of Decision: 21.08.2025. RAJIV ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. Present: Mr. G.S. Gopera, Advocate, for the petitioner. Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents to correct the category of the petitioner from SC ESM to the category of SC ESP under which the petitioner applied and was declared qualified as per registration document, CET Score Card and CET result alleging that respondent No. 4, without any reasonable cause or justification, wrongly and erroneously considered and declared the result under the wrong SC ESM (i.e. Scheduled Caste Ex-serviceman) as per result dated 7.3.2024 RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.25 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24290-2025 (O&M). -2- (Annexure P-5), without any fault on the part of the petitioner, contrary to law in wholly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and unconstitutional manner. 2 After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that with regard to the grievance, the petitioner(s) has already submitted a representation dated 18.07.2025 (Annexure P-11) but the respondents have not taken any action thereupon till date. He contends that the petitioner(s) would be satisfied at this stage, in case respondent No.4 is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid legal notice submitted by the petitioner(s), by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. 3 Notice of motion. 4 Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and she has no objection to the above request. 5 Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the consent of the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, by directing respondent No.4-the Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula, to consider and decide the representation dated 18.07.2025 (Annexure P-11) by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months of the receipt of a certified copy of this order. August 21, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.25 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document