Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010055602025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1511/2025 FORIDA BEGUM W/O RASIDUL HOQUE, VILL- SALBARI PT.I (BADONG DONGA TINIALI AWC), P.O.- GOUR NAGAR, P.S.- LAKHIPUR, DIST- GOALPARA (ASSAM), PIN-783132 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF SOCIAL WELFARE ETC., GUWAHATI-781006, ASSAM 2:THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT. UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 ASSAM 3:THE DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER GOALPARA ASSAM-783001 4:THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER JALESWARF I.C.D.S. PROJECT GAUR NAGAR DIST- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783130 5:THE SELECTION BOARD REPRESENTED BY THE C.D.P.O. JALESWAR I.C.D.S. PROJECT P.S.- LAKHIPUR DIST- GOALPARA Page No.# 2/4 ASSAM PIN-783130 6:RUPSANA KHATUN W/O SOFIKUL ISLAM VILL- BADANG DONGA P.O.- GOUR NAGAR P.S.- LAKHIPUR DIST- GOALPARA (ASSAM) PIN- 783132 7:SAHIDA BEGUM W/O AZIAL HOQUE ANGANWADI WORKER BADANG DONGA AWC P.O.- GOUR NAGAR P.S.- LAKHIPUR DIST- GOALPARA (ASSAM) PIN-783132 8:SMTI HELI SUPERVISOR ANGANWADI CENTRES GOUR NAGAR I.C.D.S. PROJECT P.O.- GOUR NAGAR DIST- GOALPARA (ASSAM) PIN-783132 9:HE BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY S.E.B.A. GUWAHATI-21 ASSAM 10:THE PRINCIPAL GOUR NAGAR SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL P.O.- GOUR NAGAR DIST- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-78313 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ROSHID, MS. T BEGUM Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, SEBA Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 19-03-2025 Heard Mr. A. Roshid, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. Also heard Ms. U. Sarma, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam appearing for the State as well as Mr. D.K. Roy, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 9, i.e. SEBA. The writ petitioner had submitted her candidature for appointment in the post of Anganwadi Helper in the Badang Donga Tiniali (General) Anganwadi Centre. Apprehending that respondent No. 6, who belongs to another locality and is not qualified for appointment to the said post, is likely to be selected, the writ petitioner has approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition. It is not in dispute that no selection and appointment has been made as on date. From the averments made in the writ petition, it is apparent that the writ petition has been instituted merely on the basis of apprehension which is not founded on any material basis. Ms. Sarma, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam submits that the writ petition is premature. The said submission of Ms. Sarma is found to be acceptable by this Court. As such, this writ petition stands disposed of as premature. The writ petitioner would, however, be at liberty to approach this Court as and when a proper cause of action arises, Page No.# 4/4 JUDGE GS Comparing Assistant