CM-15641-CWP IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA C M/s Singla Foods (Pvt.) Limited Dulladi, Nabha Punjab Financial Corporation CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE condonation of delay of 215 days in filing r 2014) seeking review of order dated 04.03 2. CWP-2014, the applicant/petitioner has not properly explained delay of 215 days in filing review application. 3. by the applicant/petitioner explaining delay in filing review application, 15641-CWP 4. however, in CWP-2014 in/and RA-CW-661-2014 in CWP IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-15641-CWP-2014 in/and RA ingla Foods (Pvt.) Limited Dulladi, Nabha Versus Financial Corporation CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Mr. Mahesh Dheer, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. V.M. Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral ) CM-15641-CWP-2014 has been filed by the petitioner for condonation of delay of 215 days in filing r 4) seeking review of order dated 04.03.2014 passed in CWP In the affidavit dated 05.12.2014 accompanied with CM 2014, the applicant/petitioner has not properly explained delay of 215 days in filing review application. In view of above and the absence of any bonafi by the applicant/petitioner explaining delay in filing review application, CWP-2014 stands dismissed. Learned counsel for the respondent however, informs that loan account of the applicant/petitioner 2014 in CWP-8724-2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2014 in/and RA-CW-661-2014 in CWP-8724-2013 Date of decision : 12.09.2025 ingla Foods (Pvt.) Limited Dulladi, Nabha …….Applicant/Petitioner ...….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY (through video conferencing), ( Oral ) 2014 has been filed by the petitioner for condonation of delay of 215 days in filing review application (RA-CW-661 .2014 passed in CWP-8724-2013. In the affidavit dated 05.12.2014 accompanied with CM-15641 2014, the applicant/petitioner has not properly explained delay of 215 In view of above and the absence of any bonafide reason shown by the applicant/petitioner explaining delay in filing review application, CM Learned counsel for the respondent – Financial Institution, forms that loan account of the applicant/petitioner – borrower has 2013 .2025 Petitioner ...….Respondent 2014 has been filed by the petitioner for 661- 2013. 15641- 2014, the applicant/petitioner has not properly explained delay of 215 de reason shown CM- Financial Institution, borrower has NAROTAM DASS 2025.09.15 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CM-15641-CWP been closed after settlement having been arrived at between borrower and the Financial Institution, in the year 2017. 5. application also stands dismissed. September 12, 2025 narotam Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable CWP-2014 in/and RA-CW-661-2014 in CWP been closed after settlement having been arrived at between borrower and the Financial Institution, in the year 2017. In view of above, the cause having become infructuous, review application also stands dismissed. September 12, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2014 in CWP-8724-2013 -2- been closed after settlement having been arrived at between borrower and the In view of above, the cause having become infructuous, review ( SHEEL NAGU ) CHIEF JUSTICE ( SANJIV BERRY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No been closed after settlement having been arrived at between borrower and the In view of above, the cause having become infructuous, review NAROTAM DASS 2025.09.15 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment