APHC010102652019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 4668/2019 Between: 1. CHALAMALASETTY VENKATA SEETHANNAHALAKSHMI, W/O SREE RAMAKRISHNA, AGE 50 YEARS, R/O OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O VIVAKA, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL,KRISHNA DIST. 2. NUKALA SRINIVASARAO, S/O SEETHARAMAIAH, AGE 47 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O VIVAKA, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST. 3. KESIREDDY VENKATA GANGADHARAM, S/O LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGE 40 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O VIVAKA, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST. 4. NARAHARISETTY KODANDARAMAKRISHNA, S/O MANIKYAM, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O VIVAKA, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST. 5. CHALAMALA SETTY VENKATA BOTLU, S/O NAGENDRAM, AGE 60 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O VIVAKA, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST. 6. SANABOINA VENKATA RAMARAO, S/O VENKATACHALAM, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O VIVAKA, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST. 7. ATMAKURI LAKSHMI, W/O VENKATASWAMY, AGE 50 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O VIVAKA, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST. 2 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRAY, DAIRY DEVELOPMENT ANDFISHERIES (FISH) DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CUM CHAIRMAN OF DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE, MACHILIPATNAM, CHILAKALAPUDI, KRISHNA DIST. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDIWADA DIVISION, GUDIWADA, KRISHNA DIST. 4. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR (R.I), MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, MUDINEPALLI, KRISHNA DIST. 5. THE DEPUTY DIRETOR OF FISHERIES, FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A RAMBABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP FOR FISHERIES (AP) The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: No representation for the Writ Petitioners. 2. Sri A. Krishna Kishore, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Fisheries and Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue are present. 3. This Writ Petition was filed in the year 2019. Since the Court has initiated a drive to list old cases under the caption ‘Specially Identified Matters’, this Writ Petition was listed on 06.03.2025 and again on 11.03.2025. 3 On both occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioners. Having noted the same, on 11.03.2025, this Court has listed the matter today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioners. 4. In this view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non- prosecution. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 17.03.2025 DSV