Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10628 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
" 1. To issue a direction to Civil Judge Junior Division Havali, District- Azamgarh to decide application 6(C)2 for interim injunction in Original Suit No. 16 of 2025 (Dinesh Yadav and others V/s Rampat and another) within stipulated period as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C2 Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge Junior Division Havali, District- Azamgarh to consider and decide the aforementioned Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Pratap Singh, Vishal Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Dinesh Yadav And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Rampat And Another .....Respondent(s)
interim injunction application (6C2 Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.
September 9, 2025 Nitika Sri. A227 No. 10628 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad