Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92892 (PNJ)

JUGRAJ SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/46014/2025 · 2025-09-26

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-46014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (112) JUGRAJ SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. to the official dated 01.08.2025 (Annexure P 2. counsel has filed Superintendent of Police, of respondent report reads as under: 46014-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH JUGRAJ SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Kehar Singh Hissowal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Japjot Singh AAG, Punjab. ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed for issuance of a direction to the official respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 01.08.2025 (Annexure P-5). In furtherance to the order dated 22.08.2025, l counsel has filed status by way of an affidavit of Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division Patti, District Tarn Taran, of respondent-State, which are taken on record. report reads as under: That during the course of investigation, no incriminating evidence came on record against the accused Akas and Simranjit Singh and on the basis of which, they were declared innocent in the above said case. Thereafter, an application for discharging the accused Akashdeep Singh has 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46014-2025 Date of Decision:- 26.09.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Kehar Singh Hissowal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Japjot Singh AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed for issuance of a direction respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner In furtherance to the order dated 22.08.2025, learned State by way of an affidavit of Lovkesh, PPS, Deputy Division Patti, District Tarn Taran, on behalf State, which are taken on record. Para 7 and 8 of the status That during the course of investigation, no incriminating evidence came on record against the accused Akashdeep Singh and Simranjit Singh and on the basis of which, they were declared innocent in the above said case. Thereafter, an application for discharging the accused Akashdeep Singh has 1 ……Petitioner ……Respondents The present petition has been filed for issuance of a direction respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner earned State Lovkesh, PPS, Deputy on behalf Para 7 and 8 of the status That during the course of investigation, no incriminating hdeep Singh and Simranjit Singh and on the basis of which, they were declared innocent in the above said case. Thereafter, an application for discharging the accused Akashdeep Singh has MANJU 2025.09.29 10:34 I agree to specified portions of this document CRM-M-46014 3. for the petitioner, who very fairly does not press the present petition stage, in light of the reply filed by the State. 4. direction to the respondent is filed within three months from today. Failing this, strict acti initiated against the concerned officer responsible for the delay. September 26, 2025 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: 46014-2025 been moved before the learned Court of Illaqa Magistrate, Patti and the same was allowed by the learned Court of Illaqa Magistrate, Patti on 08.09.2025. That during the course of investigation, the Cancellation Report has been prepared in the present case and the same is under scrutiny and after completion of legal proceedi same will be presented before the learned Court of Illaqa Magistrate, Patti at the earliest. A copy of the status report has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner, who very fairly does not press the present petition in light of the reply filed by the State. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-authorities to ensure that the cancellation report is filed within three months from today. Failing this, strict acti initiated against the concerned officer responsible for the delay. September 26, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No 2 been moved before the learned Court of Illaqa Magistrate, he same was allowed by the learned Court of Illaqa Magistrate, Patti on 08.09.2025. That during the course of investigation, the Cancellation Report has been prepared in the present case and the same is under scrutiny and after completion of legal proceedings, the same will be presented before the learned Court of Illaqa Magistrate, Patti at the earliest. A copy of the status report has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner, who very fairly does not press the present petition, at this in light of the reply filed by the State. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a authorities to ensure that the cancellation report is filed within three months from today. Failing this, strict action shall be initiated against the concerned officer responsible for the delay. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 2 been moved before the learned Court of Illaqa Magistrate, he same was allowed by the learned Court of Illaqa That during the course of investigation, the Cancellation Report has been prepared in the present case and the same is ngs, the same will be presented before the learned Court of Illaqa A copy of the status report has been supplied to the counsel at this In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a authorities to ensure that the cancellation report on shall be MANJU 2025.09.29 10:34 I agree to specified portions of this document