Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:29246 Court No. - 37 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29768 of 2024 Petitioner :- Basudev Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Subhash Chand Kanaujia Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Heard Sri Subhash Chand Kanaujia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anshul Nigam, learned standing counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos. 2 & 3 to decided the pending representations dated 12.06.2024, 26.06.2024 and 20.07.2024.
3. From the perusal of the aforesaid representations, it is evident that by means of the said representations, the petitioner has prayed for the relief against the private opposite party nos. 4 &
5.
4. Learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that the dispute is private in nature and the petitioner has an efficacious and alternative remedy available under common law. He very emphatically argued the petitioner is aggrieved against the alleged act of the respondent nos. 4 & 5 who are the private persons and not the State authorities and as such the instant writ petition is not entertainable.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage prays for and is allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with the liberty to avail the remedies as are available to the petitioner under common law.
6. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Arif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad