Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9289 (GAU)

DHAJEN RAY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

AB/655/2025 · 2025-04-23

Manash Ranjan Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010055672025 2025:GAU-AS:4941 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/655/2025 DHAJEN RAY S/O- LATE HAREN RAY R/O- NO.2 BREDDHABASHI, PS MANIKPUR, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:SARASWATI ARYA W/O LATE BISHNU ARYA R/O NO. 2 BREDDHABASHI P.S. MANIKPUR DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M H AHMED, MR. O ULLAH,I AMIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK ORDER 24.04.2025 Heard Mr. M. H. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. K. Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State. 2) Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner, namely, Dhajen Ray, son of late Haren Ray, Page No.# 2/2 resident of No. 2 Breddhabashi, Police Station-Manikpur, district-Bongaigaon has filed this application under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 seeking his pre-arrest bail in Manikpur Police Station Case No. 16/2025, registered under Sections 126(2)/75/137(2)/351(2) BNS, 2023 read with Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. 3) Mr. M. H. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of the matter, the petitioner has already been arrested in said Manikpur P.S. Case No. 16/2025. 4) In view of the above, this pre-arrest bail application, being infructuous, stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant