Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA-4996-2019 (O&M) -1- 204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4996-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.03.2025 State of Haryana and others ...Appellants Vs. Smt. Rani
...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Arjun Sheoran, Advocate Ms. Tejasvi Sheokand, Advocate for the respondent. *** ANIL KSHETARPAL
, J.
(Oral)
1. The defendant/State of Haryana assails the correctness of concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the Courts below while decreeing plaintiff's suit for damages to the extent of Rs.2,00,000/- alongwith interest @ 9% per annum. It is case of the plaintiff that on 24.03.2011, she came to Government hospital for check-up. She was motivated by the staff of the Hospital to undergo Tubectomy (family planning operation), which was conducted. However, the Doctors failed to examine whether the plaintiff was already pregnant or not. Subsequently, she gave birth to male child on
20.10.2011.
2. Both the Courts have found that the Doctors in the Hospital failed to conduct ultrasound in order to know whether she was already pregnant or not. Thus, the Courts have ordered recovery of Rs. 2,00,000/- alongwith NEERAJ 2025.04.01 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA-4996-2019 (O&M) -2- interest.
3.
Learned counsel representing the appellant submits that there is a scheme, which allows compensation of Rs.30,000/-, in case of failure of sterilization of the operation. She submits that the Courts have erred in ordering recovery of Rs. 2,00,000/-.
4. This Court has considered the submissions made by the learned counsel representing the parties.
5. The scheme is a unilateral scheme issued by the Government. The Court is required to assess actual damages.
6.
Learned counsel representing the appellant did not make any other submission.
7. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, no ground to interfere is made out.
8. Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
9. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) 25.03.2025
JUDGE neeraj Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No NEERAJ 2025.04.01 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document