Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92881 (PNJ)

RENU AND ANR v. RAVINDER SINGH SAHARAN

CRR(F)/307/2016 · 2025-07-08

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRR(F)-307-2016(O&M) -1- 228 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR(F)-307-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.07.2025 Renu and another ....Petitioner(s) Versus Ravinder Singh Saharan .....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Eeshan Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Kohar, Advocate for the respondent. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J. (Oral) 1. The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 16.08.2016 for enhancement of the interim maintenance granted by the learned District Judge, Family Court, Bhiwani. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that during the pendency of the present petition, the petitioners have filed a petition under Section 127 Cr.P.C for enhancement of the interim maintenance and the aforesaid petition has been allowed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhiwani vide order dated 29.08.2023 to the extent that so far as maintenance of Rs. 5,000/- per month which was granted to the son is concerned, the same has been enhanced to Rs. 22,000/- per month and so far as the maintenance of Rs. 10,000/- per month which was granted to the wife is concerned, the same has not been enhanced and the relief has been declined on the ground that she is having her own source of income. He submitted that so far as the aforesaid declining of enhancement of amount to the wife under RAKESH KUMAR 2025.07.11 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRR(F)-307-2016(O&M) -2- Section 127 Cr.P.C is concerned, the petitioner-wife has filed a separate petition for challenging the aforesaid order in CRR-1625 of 2023 which is pending before this Court in which notice has been issued and therefore, so far as the present petition in which the enhancement is sought pertaining to the order passed under Section 125 Cr.P.C is concerned, the same has become infructuous because now a fresh order has been passed under Section 127 Cr.P.C. 3. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present revision petition is dismissed. 08.07.2025 (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) rakesh JUDGE Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAKESH KUMAR 2025.07.11 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment