Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9286 (RAJ)

RAJESH SON OF KAJOD MAL GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3133/2025 · 2025-03-04

Bhuwan Goyal, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9351-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 3133/2025 Rajesh Son of Kajod Mal Gurjar, Aged About 43 Years, Resident of Mundghisya, Tehsil Bhandarej, District Dausa (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Dausa, District Dausa. 4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Bhandarej, District Dausa. 5. Radhakishan S/o Shriya Gurjar, Resident Of Moroli, Tehsil Behrawanda, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 6. Jagdish S/o Ramnarayan, Resident Of Moroli, Tehsil Behrawanda, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 7. Khiladi S/o Ramnarayan, Resident Of Moroli, Tehsil Behrawanda, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 8. Mohan S/o Ramrakh, Resident Of Moroli, Tehsil Behrawanda, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 9. Laxman S/o Jagdish, Resident Of Moroli, Tehsil Behrawanda, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 10. Hari S/o Moolchand, Resident Of Moroli, Tehsil Behrawanda, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 11. Ramkishan S/o Moolchand, Resident Of Moroli, Tehsil Behrawanda, District Dausa (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Vyas Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 to 4 : Ms. Shikha Sharma Advocate on behalf of Mr. G.S. Gill Additional Advocate General. [2025:RJ-JP:9351-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-3133/2025] HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 04/03/2025 1. This PIL petition has been filed seeking issuance direction for removal of encroachment on the face of order dated 17.02.2025 whereby Tehsildar, Tehsil Bhandarej, District Dausa has already issued a direction for removal of encroachment with the police help. 2. Present is not a case of inaction as the authorities have already passed an order only on 17.02.2025 and filing of petition on 25.02.2025 is frivolous and uncalled for. 3. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ MANOJ NARWANI-ANU/14