Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13479 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
2. Petitioner who is aggrieved by order of transfer dated 15.06.2025 on the ground that it is against trnasfer policy as according to him transfer policy permits posting of spouses at the same station. Petitioner also takes a plea that children of petitioner are studying and trnasfer in mid session will adversely affect their study and is also against transfer policy.
3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that since the petitioner has been transferred in administrative exigency, she may not have any grievance however he is not averse to the representation of petitioner being directed to be considered and decided in accordance with law. He submits that respondent No. 3 is the competent authority in the matter.
4. In view of the above this petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent concerned to consider and dispose of the pending representation of petitioner dated 27.06.2025 within a period of two months from the production of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law and by means of a reasoned and speaking order.
September 10, 2025 Nadeem Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivam Shukla, Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Anu Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad