DEVENDRA PRATAP JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/31216/2025 · 2025-09-08
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92856 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92856 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31216 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"(a). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to decide the Case No.RST /7534/2017 as well as Computerize Case No.T2017052055017534 (Arun Vs. Vrinda) Under Section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 forthwith within stipulated period."
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that restoration application filed in proceedings under Section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending consideration before respondent no. 2 since 2017. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 2 to decide the Case No. RST /7534/2017, Computerize Case No. T2017052055017534 (Arun vs. Vrinda), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month, from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 9, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Devendra Pratap Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad