IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 236 Pinki and another Nirmal Kumar alias Nirmal Singh CORAM : HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. Ishan Singh Cooner, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Cooner, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. C.S. Singhal, Advocate for the *** NAMIT KUMAR 1. The instant challenging the impugned order dated Court, Ambala been allowed partly No.2 and dismissing the same qua petitioner No.1. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners settled before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court vide settlement/agreement dated 12.03.2025, which is already on record and, therefore, the instant petition has been rendered infuctuous. abide by the terms and conditions set out in the settlement. 3. Disposed of, as having become infructuous. April 07, 2025 Pankaj* IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR(F)- Date of Decision: Pinki and another Versus alias Nirmal Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Ishan Singh Cooner, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Cooner, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. C.S. Singhal, Advocate for the respondent. *** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) The instant criminal revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 27.01.2016 whereby the petition filed by them under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been allowed partly by allowing maintenance of Rs.1500/ No.2 and dismissing the same qua petitioner No.1. Learned counsel for petitioners settled before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court vide settlement/agreement dated 12.03.2025, which is already on record and, therefore, the instant petition has been rendered infuctuous. de by the terms and conditions set out in the settlement. Disposed of, as having become infructuous. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -57-2016 Date of Decision:07.04.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondent NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Ishan Singh Cooner, Advocate for petition has been filed by the petitioner 27.01.2016 passed by the learned Family the petition filed by them under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has allowing maintenance of Rs.1500/- per month to petitioner No.2 and dismissing the same qua petitioner No.1. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the matter has be settled before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court vide settlement/agreement dated 12.03.2025, which is already on record and, therefore, the instant petition has been rendered infuctuous. Needless to say that parties shall de by the terms and conditions set out in the settlement. Disposed of, as having become infructuous. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Petitioners ... Respondent petitioners passed by the learned Family the petition filed by them under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has petitioner submits that the matter has been settled before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court vide settlement/agreement dated 12.03.2025, which is already on record and, therefore, Needless to say that parties shall PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.04.08 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh