HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34215 of 2025 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Shri Maheshwari Prasad Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State. 2. This application U/S 528 BNSS has been preferred for quashing of the entire proceedings, including proceedings of Criminal Case No.6122 of 2023 (State Vs. Muskan), arising out of Case Crime No.168 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Kannauj, District Kannauj, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kannauj, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on the record. It is further submitted that pursuant to the order dated 03.07.2025 passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Application U/s 482 No.41881 of 2024 (Muskan Kinnar Vs. State of U.P. and another). The parties have compromised the matter before the Court concerned and the same has been verified. Learned counsel for the applicant further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicant and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 4. On the other hand, learned AGA for the State has no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. In view of the fact that applicant and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromised and the said compromise has already been verified by the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Maheshwari Prasad Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Muskan Kinnar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned charge-sheets/cognizance- summoning order and entire proceedings of Case Crime No.168 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Kannauj, District Kannauj, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kannauj, against the applicant, namely, Muskan Kinnar, is hereby quashed. 7. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. September 9, 2025 RKM NA528 No. 34215 of 2025 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad