IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67478 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-501 Year-2024 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Ram Kalesh Kumar Son of Ram Vilash Yadav R/o Village - Sito Mahto Tol, Ward No.- 17, P.S.- Alauli, District - Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rana Randhir Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 3 22-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 501 of 2024, registered for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 118, 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS. 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner and other co- accused persons armed with spade, iron rod, lathi and danda started forcibly ploughing the land of the informant. When the informant opposed, this petitioner gave her a spade blow on her head causing its fracture and bleeding. Other persons assaulted the informant with lathi and danda. When the family members of the informant intervened, they were also assaulted. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67478 of 2025(3) dt.22-12-2025 2/3 petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and the injury report shows only a lacerated wound on top of the forehead caused by hard and blunt object but there is no allegation against this petitioner for causing this injury by hard and blunt object and this falsifies the allegation against the petitioner though due to fracture, this injury is though stated to be grievous. The petitioner and the informant side are agnates and there is land dispute between them. The FIR has been lodged after delay of 21 days for which there is no satisfactory explanation. The petitioner is having clean antecedent and he is in custody since 18.06.2025. Charge sheet has been submitted. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. 6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the nature of allegation and clean antecedent of the petitioner and further considering his period of custody and submission of charge sheet, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Khagaria/concerned court, in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67478 of 2025(3) dt.22-12-2025 3/3 connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 501 of 2024, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following conditions: (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court. (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. Anuradha/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U T