Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9284 (UTT)

RISHI RAM BHATT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/322/2019 · 2025-06-11

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB No. 322 of 2019 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. M.C. Pant, learned counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. S.K. Nailwal and Mr. D.S. Bora, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous, by efflux of time. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay, .J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, .J.) 11.06.2025 Navin