PRIYANKA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/8999/2025 · 2025-08-21
Sumeet Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92832 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92832 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
115
CRWP-8999-2025 Date of decision: 21.08.2025 Priyanka and another
....Petitioners V/s
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioners
(Through V.C.). ***** SUMEET GOEL, J.
1.
By way of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 7
2.
Notice of motion to respondents Nos. 1 to 3 (i.e. official respondents).
3.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl.AG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
4.
As per the petitioners, they have married on 11.07.2025 against the wishes of respondent Nos. 4 to 7, who happen to be the family members/relative of the petitioners.
5.
Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner No.1-Priyanka is 10.01.1994 and petitioner No.2-Kunal is 12.01.2000.
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.08.21 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh
CRWP-8999-2025
P a g e | 2
6.
Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage as also the merits of contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 (Superintendent of Police, Bhiwani) to look into the representation dated 11.08.2025 (Annexure P-7) stated to have been submitted by the petitioners & pass appropriate orders thereupon within two weeks from today.
7.
Liberty is reserved in favour of private respondents to seek recall of this order on showing sufficient cause.
8.
However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any other case, then this order shall not preclude the competent authority from taking lawful action against the petitioners.
9.
The petition stands disposed off. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.
(SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE 21.08.2025 Naveen
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.08.21 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh