HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31114 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J. HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. The present petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to demolish any part of the house of petitioner and also not to compel her to sign any agreement of sale against her wishes. 2. Sri Rajeev Gupta, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has placed on record the instructions received from Executive Engineer, Provincial Division, PWD, Varanasi, wherein it is stated that the respondents have no objection in case the present petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 20.5.2025 in Writ-C No. 12319 of 2025 (Shahnawaz Khan Vs. State of U.P. and others). 3. Relevant part of the order passed in the said case is as follows:- "5. The District Magistrate, Varanasi has filed his affidavit on behalf of the State-respondents. The stand taken therein is that the State- Government is proposing to widen and strengthen Dal Mandi road. On 20.3.2025 a preliminary estimate was sent to the State Government for the said purpose. The total estimated cost was Rs. 22059.46 lakhs. Subsequently, a revised estimate was also submitted. The Public Works Department made demarcation of the land/houses which would be affected by widening under the proposed work. It is unequivocally stated in the affidavit that the respondents would acquire title over the land/building which would be affected by the proposed project on basis of mutual consent or through acquisition under the provisions of the Act of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Qaisar Kamal Ansari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Qamar Jahan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 2013. The relevant assertions contained in this regard in paragraphs 13, 14 and 15 are extracted below:- "13-That, the widening and strengthening of the road in question will be completed after the settling the dispute amicably either by purchasing the land in question as provisions of the government order No. 2/2015/215/??-13-2015-20(48)/2011 dated 19.03.2015, with mutual consent/agreement or as per the prescribed provisions under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. A true copy of the government order dated 19/03/2015 is being filed herewith and marked as Annexure No. 4 to the affidavit. 14-That widening and strengthening of the road in question would be completed after providing the compensation under the provisions of the government order (supra), and if the land owner does not give his consent, then the provisions of the Act of 2013 would be applied. 15-That at present, there is no demolition drive going on adjacent of the road side of the road in question for road widening, those land owners come in purview in the alignment of the road widening and strengthening of the road in question they must be dealt with under the due process of law and no one have deprive their legal rights." 6. Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Rajeev Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State submits that the respondents would not disturb the possession of the petitioner nor demolish his constructions unless title over the same is acquired through voluntary transfer or by compulsory acquisition or any other mode recognized under law. 7. Keeping in mind the aforesaid stand, the writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the same." 4. Accordingly, the instant petition also stands disposed of in same terms. September 9, 2025 Ashok Kr. WRIC No. 31114 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad