RAJESH GAUD AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/13508/2025 · 2025-09-09
Ajit Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92820 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92820 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13508 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard Shri Anand Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioners, Shri Hari Narayan Singh, learned counsel for respondents No. 3 to 5 , and Shri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel representing State respondents.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioners who have retired from the office of the respondent No. 5 are claiming leave encashment amount as against 300 days earned leave to which they claim to be entitled in law.
3. It is submitted that in the above regard petitioners have approached the authority by making representation 22.08.2025 but no order has been passed thereupon. 4.Shri H.N.Singh, learned counsel for respondents No. 3 to 5 does not have any objection in the event representation of petitioners is directed to be disposed of by the respondent in accordance with law.
5. In view of the above this petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent concerned to consider and disposed of the pending representation of petitioners dated 22.08.2025 within a period of two months from the production of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law and by means of a reasoned and speaking order.
September 10, 2025 Nadeem Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh (Ajit Kumar,J.) Rajesh Gaud And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad