Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92817 (ALL)

SHARDENDU KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13702/2025 · 2025-09-11

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13702 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard Mr. Kamal Kumar Kesherwani, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nagendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for respondent nos.3 and 4 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondent-authorities to pay the amount of gratuity of the mother of the petitioner along with admissible interest to the petitioner forthwith. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has moved representation before the competent authority, for redressal of his grievance, but nothing has been done till date. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to take decision on the representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA as well as learned Standing Counsel submit that they have no objection in case fresh a representation is moved by the petitioner before the competent authority, the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2 Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, U.P. at Allahabad, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamal Kumar Kesherwani Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Nagendra Kumar Pandey Shardendu Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 12, 2025 Rahul. WRIA No. 13702 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad