Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92780 (MAD)

M/s Sundaram Finance Ltd v. S Sankar

Arb Appln/686/2024 · 2025-02-13

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arb. Appln. No.686 of 2024 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.02.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb. Appln. No.686 of 2024 M/s Sundaram Finance Ltd No 21 Patullos Road Chennai 600 002 Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr Srinivasan R Applicant Vs S Sankar S/o.Mr.S.Sengamalam, No.3/31 C, Kela Street, Manakudaiyan, Senthurai, Manakudayan, Ariyalur 621 719 and another Respondents For Applicant : Mr.M. Arunachalam For Advocate Commissioner : Ms.G. Lavanya - - - - - The Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court has repossessed the vehicle pursuant to orders passed by this Court. A report has also been filed by the Advocate Commissioner stating the same. The Advocate Commissioner has also sought for an additional remuneration through a Memo filed by her. The Advocate Commissioner was initially paid a remuneration of Rs.30,000/-, vide order of this Court, dated 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb. Appln. No.686 of 2024 18.10.2024. Though the Advocate Commissioner seeks for an additional remuneration of Rs.30,000/-, this Court after giving due consideration to the work done by the Advocate Commissioner is inclined to fix a sum of Rs.20,000/- towards additional remuneration. 2. The respondents have been duly served with the notice in this application. The Advocate Commissioner has also served the notice on the respondents as seen from her report. Despite service of notice in this application, the respondents have chosen not to enter appearance. Hence the respondents are set ex-parte in this application. 3. Since the vehicle has already been repossessed and handed over to the applicant pursuant to the directions issued by this Court, this application will have to be closed, since there is no appearance on the side of the respondents, despite service of notice on them. 4. After recording the fact that the vehicle has been repossessed by the Advocate Commissioner and the same has been handed over to the applicant, this application is closed. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb. Appln. No.686 of 2024 5. The applicant is directed to pay an additional remuneration of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) to the Advocate Commissioner, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 13.02.2025 vsi2 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb. Appln. No.686 of 2024 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. vsi2 Arb. Appln. No.686 of 2024 13.02.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis