JAVID SAMAD v. STATE OF J AND K AND ORS. REVENUE(State Government)
WP(C)/3195/2019 · 2025-03-14
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9278 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9278 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S.No.11 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 3195/2019 CM(6389/2019) JAVID SAMAD …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Mohammad Ashraf Wani, Advocate
Vs.
STATE OF J AND K AND ORS. REVENUE
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. S.S. Kala, AAG
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER 14-03-2025
1. The petitioner-Javid Samad in the very title of the writ petition identifies himself to be an attorney holder of Jan Mohammad Dar meaning thereby the institution of the writ petition is taking place not by his individual interest/status to the subject matter of the writ petition.
2. A copy of the attorney annexed with the writ petition is a General Power of Attorney dated 25-02- 2010, which by no stretch of reading and reference enables Javid Samad to come forward with the institution of any litigation in general muchless the institution of the present writ petition in particular before this Court.
3. As such, the writ petition as it is, is dismissed with liberty to file fresh one in case if Javid Samad has, by reference to his own self, an interest in the subject matter or in case by reference to Jan Mohammad Dar then by having a proper power of attorney from Mr. Jan Mohammad for pursuing the matter in litigation before this Court. As such dismissed.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 14-03-2025 Mubashir