HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10590 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "To issue a order or direction in the suitable nature by directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jaunpur to hear and decide the application under order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of C.P.C. i.e. paper no. 6С dated 13.08.2025 filed in Original Suit No. 732 of 2025 (Ram Jatan Vs. Shobhawati and others). " 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jaunpur to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Prasad Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ram Jatan .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Shobhawati Devi And 20 Others .....Respondent(s) Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 9, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 10590 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad