HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13309 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Saurav Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Abhishek Srivastava on behalf of respondent no.4 and Sri Satvik Chaudhary holding brief of Sri Adarsh Bhushan, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3 . 2. Impugned order is a reasoned order whereby the reimbursement of TTA bill was refused on ground that it was submitted beyond 6 months and reference was given of Chapter-4 Volume III of Financial Hand Book. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to show any averment or ground in the writ petition that the aforesaid provision was wrongly applied. 4. In the aforesaid circumstances, there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order. 5. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. September 9, 2025 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Saurav Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhishek Srivastava, Adarsh Bhushan, C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ram Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad