Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92738 (PNJ)

SURINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER v. RAJNEESH KUMAR

COCP/4263/2025 · 2025-09-09

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[219] Surinder Singh and another Rajneesh Kumar, Executive Officer, MC, Rampura Phul, Bathinda Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] against the respondent for wilfully and deliberately disobeying order dated 28.05.2025 (Annexure P titled as others’. [2] of the respondent and has filed her same is taken on record. [3] stands released in compliance [4] amount has been released, however, he disputes the calculati seeks liberty to avail his remedies in accordance with law. [5] passed in the present contempt petition. The same stands with liberty as prayed for. 09.09.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4263 Date of Decision : Surinder Singh and another versus Rajneesh Kumar, Executive Officer, MC, Rampura Phul, Bathinda HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate for the petitioners. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the contempt petition is for initiating action against the respondent for wilfully and deliberately disobeying order dated 28.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed in CWP titled as ‘Surinder Singh and another versus State of Punjab and Ms. Gauri Sharma, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent and has filed her vakalatnama same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the amount stands released in compliance with the Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute that the amount has been released, however, he disputes the calculati seeks liberty to avail his remedies in accordance with law. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition. The same stands with liberty as prayed for. 09.09.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4263-2025 Date of Decision : 09.09.2025 …Petitioners versus ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for the petitioners. Prayer in the contempt petition is for initiating action against the respondent for wilfully and deliberately disobeying order 1) passed in CWP-15996-2005 in case ‘Surinder Singh and another versus State of Punjab and Ms. Gauri Sharma, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf vakalatnama in Court today. The arned counsel for the respondent submits that the amount with the order passed by the Writ Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute that the amount has been released, however, he disputes the calculation and seeks liberty to avail his remedies in accordance with law. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition. The same stands disposed off (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Prayer in the contempt petition is for initiating action against the respondent for wilfully and deliberately disobeying order 2005 in case ‘Surinder Singh and another versus State of Punjab and Ms. Gauri Sharma, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf in Court today. The arned counsel for the respondent submits that the amount order passed by the Writ Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute that the on and In view of the above, no further orders are required to be disposed off, RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.09.09 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document