Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9273 (RAJ)

NAND RAM KHARADIA v. STATE PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPORS

CW/11302/2012 · 2025-09-10

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36757] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11302/2012 Nand Ram Kharadia S/o Shri Jhuntha Ram, aged 70 years R/o Village Shyam Nagar, Post Mawanda Railway Station, Gram Panchayat Mankdi, Dhani, Khatyawala, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan, Rural Development and Panchayati, Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur. 3. Additional Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sikar. 4. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Than, District Sikar. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11298/2012 Nand Ram Kharadia S/o Shri Jhuntha Ram, aged 70 years R/o Village Shyam Nagar, Post Mawanda Railway Station, Gram Panchayat Mankdi, Dhani, Khatyawala, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan, Rural Development and Panchayati, Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur. 3. Additional Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sikar. 4. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Than, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, AGC [2025:RJ-JP:36757] (2 of 2) [CW-11302/2012] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 10/09/2025 None marked presence on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents-State has submitted that the petitioner- Nand Ram Kharadia had expired on 26.04.2019. In support of the said contention, learned counsel has placed a copy of the death certificate of the petitioner, before the Court. In light of the same, learned counsel has submitted that the matter has become infructuous. In view of the above, the instant petitions are dismissed as rendered infructuous. Howsoever, petitioner is at liberty to revive the petition, if facts are otherwise. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-213-214