Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9272 (UTT)

ASHISH SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/667/2024 · 2025-05-14

Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3890 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA NO.667 of 2024 Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. Mr. Rachit Manglik proxy counsel for Mr. Vivek Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy A.G. along with Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous in view of the fact that the applicant has already been arrested by the police. Accordingly, he seeks permission to withdraw the present application. 4. Permission is granted. 5. In view of the above, the Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 14.05.2025 Mamta 2025:UHC:3890