Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9272 (GAU)

GAJENDRA KACHARI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

WP(C)/2307/2021 · 2025-05-01

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010056382021 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2307/2021 GAJENDRA KACHARI S/O- LT. CHELBARG KACHARI, R/O- VILL- GATHIAPARA, P.O. DHANUBHANGA, DIST.- GOALPARA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE SECRETARY (E) TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM IRRIGATION DEPTT. ESTABLISHMENT BRANCH DISPUR GHY-6 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DUDHNOI DIVISION (IRRIGATION) DUDHNOI P.O. DUDHNOI DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783101 4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION ASSAM P.O. DUDHNOI DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783101 Page No.# 2/3 5:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX (NEW BUILDING) DISPUR GHY-6 6:THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GHY- Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A SHEIKH, K U AHMED,MS F INTAZ Advocate for the Respondent : SC, IRRIGATION, GA, ASSAM,SC, FINANCE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 02.05.2025 Heard Shri MA Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri N Upadhyay, learned Standing Counsel, Irrigation Department, Assam as well as Shri A Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department, Assam. The matter pertains to the pensionary benefit of the petitioner who had retired as a Helper. Shri Upadhyay, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department has, however, submitted that immediately after the institution of the writ proceeding, the matter was settled. He has in fact placed before this Court copy of the PPO which was issued on 24.08.2022 itself. The said PPO also includes the communication of the same date to the Treasury Officer, Goalpara regarding the onward action. Though Shri MA Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not have the instructions of the said development, noticing the aforesaid development, this Court is of the view that there is no reason to keep this writ petition pending. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. Page No.# 3/3 Copies of the PPO with the enclosures presented to the Court are made part of the records. The said copies are also to be given to Shri MA Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner. JUDGE Comparing Assistant