Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92719 (ALL)

DILEEP KUMAR MISHRA v. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTE SECRETARY (MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS) AND 3 OTHER

WPIL/2637/2025 · 2025-09-14

Arun Kumar, Manoj Kumar Gupta

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2637 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J. HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. The case of the petitioner is that respondent no.4 has encroached over part of a public road by constructing boundary wall over the same. The petitioner places reliance on report of revenue authorities submitted on his complaint and in which it is stated that certain part of boundary wall of respondent no.4 exists over the land, which is P.W.D. road. 2. The petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding respondent no.2 to remove the encroachment. 3. As it would require a factual enquiry, therefore, without commenting on merit of the allegations, we dispose of the instant writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the Executive Engineer, National Highway Division, P.W.D. Banda, alongwith a true copy of the instant order, and in which event, he would take appropriate decision on the same, after hearing respondent no.4. September 15, 2025 Anil Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Dileep Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Represente Secretary (Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways) And 3 Other .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad