(Rev.Pet.No.60/2025) 2025:CGHC:14332 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 60 of 2025 1. South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Through Chairman-cum-Managing Director, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2. Director Personnel, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Head Quarter, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. Deputy General Manager (Personnel), South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Hasdeo Area, District Korea, Chhattisgarh 4. Sub Area Manager, Office of Sub Area Manager, Rajnagar, R.O. Sub Area, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Hasdeo Area, Post Rajnagar Colliery, District Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh 5. Senior Manager (Personnel), Rajnagar, R.O. Sub Area, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Hasdeo Area, Post Rajnagar Colliery, SECL Hasdeo Area, District Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh (Respondents No.1 to 5) ... Petitioners versus 1. Laxmi Bai, W/o Banshi Lal Sahu, D/o Fandu, Aged about 42 years, R/o Rajnagar Colliery, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Hasdeo Area, Distt. Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh 2. Santosh Kumar Sahu, S/o Banshi Lal Sahu, Aged about 27 years, R/o Rajnagar, R.O. Colliery, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Hasdeo Area, Distt. Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh (Petitioners) ... Respondents Single Bench: - Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2025.03.26 10:48:18 +0530 (Rev.Pet.No.60/2025) Order (In Chamber) 25/03/2025 1. The above-stated review petition is taken-up for consideration in Chamber in view of Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007 (for short, ‘the Rules of 2007’). 2. I have gone through the review petition and the annexed documents. 3. After going through the record of the review petition and the documents annexed therewith and also the order under review, I do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting review of the order dated 4-12- 2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(S)No.7031/2016. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed in limine in terms of Rule 90(2) of the Rules of 2007 finding no sufficient cause for review of the order under review. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma