HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10837 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " i. Issue an order or direction directing the Learned Civil Judge (S.D.) Bhadohi at Gyanpur to decide the 6-C Application dated 24.11.2023 in Original Suit No. 323 of 2023 (Lal Chand and others Vs. Lal Bahadur and another), upon which since 28.8.2024 date is fixing to decide the same, but till date the same has not been got decided, expeditiously within a stipulated period as is fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Bhadohi at Gyanpur to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 11, 2025/S. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikas Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Lal Bahadur And Another .....Petitioner(s) Lal Chandra And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad