Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13400 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1.Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.K.Rai on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 4.
2. Petitioner is a widow and admittedly she is getting family pension. However, she is aggrieved that arrears of family pension and Dearness Allowance are not paid, despite a calculation is made by the respondents.
3. Petitioner in support of averments made in paragraph 9 of the writ petition is not able to show that she has repeatedly approached concerned respondents. Still considering that legally permissible claim of the petitioner ought to have been cleared by the respondents, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that petitioner can approach afresh to the respondents making specific grievance which will be considered in accordance with law by the concerned respondent expeditiously taking note of the order passed by this Court in Writ-A No.12603 of 2025, Neutral Citation No.2025:AHC:149485. September 10, 2025 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Suresh Singh (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Premkali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad