IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 220 Gurmail Kaur and others Pargat Singh and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the suit filed by the appellant has been dismissed. motion has not been issued. The order sheets shows that as many as five times the matter has been listed for hearing, out of which on 03.10.2019, 31.10.2023 and on the last date of hearing i.e. 15.1.2024 there was no representation on behalf of appell dates the matter was adjourned either on request of learned arguing counsel or on request of learned proxy counsel for the appellants. Even today there is no representation on behalf of appellants. appellants RSA-4973-2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.4973 of 2018 Date of decision :-28.03.2025 Gurmail Kaur and others Versus Pargat Singh and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the appellants. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellants have filed the present appeal against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs for declaration and permanent injunction has been dismissed. The matter pertains to the year 2018 and is still notic motion has not been issued. The order sheets shows that as many as five times the matter has been listed for hearing, out of which on 03.10.2019, 31.10.2023 and on the last date of hearing i.e. 15.1.2024 there was no representation on behalf of appell dates the matter was adjourned either on request of learned arguing counsel or on request of learned proxy counsel for the appellants. Even today there is no representation on behalf of appellants. A bare reading of the above fac s have exhibited an utterly casual attitude in the pursuit of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.4973 of 2018 (O & M) .2025 …..Appellants …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA filed the present appeal against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the suit filed for declaration and permanent injunction The matter pertains to the year 2018 and is still notice of motion has not been issued. The order sheets shows that as many as five times the matter has been listed for hearing, out of which on 03.10.2019, 31.10.2023 and on the last date of hearing i.e. 15.1.2024 there was no representation on behalf of appellants and on rest of the dates the matter was adjourned either on request of learned arguing counsel or on request of learned proxy counsel for the appellants. Even today there is no representation on behalf of appellants. A bare reading of the above facts shows that the exhibited an utterly casual attitude in the pursuit of VIJAY ASIJA 2025.04.05 14.20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the appellants have adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the applicant interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to March 28 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No RSA-4973-2018 the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the s in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the applicants-appellants nor their interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 8, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the est of justice. On the other hand, the appellants adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that their counsel are seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with the same for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.04.05 14.20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document