Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92653 (ALL)

RAM KHELAWAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/13432/2025 · 2025-09-09

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13432 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri K.K.Singh holding brief of Sri Rajeev Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Archit Mandhyan for respondent nos.5 to 7. 2. Petitioner was placed under suspension vide order dated 10.5.2023 with a condition that he will remain attached with Regional Office, Mandi Parishad, Prayagraj. However, he did not attend the office, therefore, his application for subsistence allowance was rejected vide order dated 6.8.2025. 3. In the writ petition except a vague averment in paragraph 22, that petitioner was ill and was under treatment at Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital, Prayagraj and Moti Lal Nehru Medical College, Prayagraj which is not supported by any documents since no medical prescription is placed on record, therefore, reason assigned in the impugned order are not perverse and since the petitioner has failed to comply with condition of suspension order, he is not entitled for subsistence allowance. 4. It is brought on record that petitioner has suffered disciplinary proceedings and also an inquiry report was submitted in the Month of April, 2025. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents on the basis of instructions submitted that Disciplinary Authority has issued show cause notices dated 26.7.2025 and 6.8.2025 to the petitioner, however, he has not Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Kumar, Rajeev Kumar Agrawal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Archit Mandhyan, C.S.C. Ram Khelawan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) submitted any reply. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that petitioner has not submitted reply to the above show cause notices and he will submit his reply within a period of two weeks and prays that thereafter disciplinary proceedings be concluded expeditiously. 7. In the aforesaid circumstances without interfering with the impugned order, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that if the petitioner submits his reply within a period of two weeks from today to the show cause notice as rerferred above, the Disciplinary Authority will conclude the disciplinary proceedings expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks. September 10, 2025 SB WRIA No. 13432 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad