CHANDRA MOHAN SINGHAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/14119/2024 · 2025-04-23
Ajay Bhanot
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92649 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92649 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:62972 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14119 of 2024 Petitioner :- Chandra Mohan Singhal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Yadav,Krishna Kumar Upadhyay,Mahendra Pratap Counsel for Respondent :- Abhishek Srivastava,C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
1. Heard Shri Mahendra Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondent No.1 and Shri Abhishek Srivastava, learned counsel assisted by Ms. Suramya Srivastava, learned counsel on behalf of the respondents No. 2 and 3.
2. The petitioner has assailed the impugned order dated 01.01.2024 passed by the respondent No.3 and the order dated 24.08.2024 passed by the respondent No.2 awarding major penalty of demolition to the post of Assistant Engineer from the post of Executive Engineer.
3. The only submission raised by Shri Mahendra Pratap,
learned counsel for the petitioner is that the authorities did not adopt the procedure known to law while dispensing with his services. The petitioner was not given an opportunity to examine any departmental witnesses. In fact no departmental witness was produced before the Enquiry Officer. 4. Shri Abhishek Srivastava, learned counsel assisted by
Ms. Suramya Srivastava, learned counsel on behalf of the respondents No. 2 and 3 has fairly called attention to the averments in the counter affidavit which admits to the fact that no departmental witness was examined in the enquiry proceedings. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. The following facts are established from the record and upon exchange of pleadings. 7. The departmental witnesses were not produced before the Enquiry Officer to bring home the charges against the petitioner. The petitioner was hence never given an opportunity to examine the said witnesses. 8. In the facts of this case, the introduction of the departmental witnesses was imperative for proving the charges against the petitioner as per applicable standards of evidence in the departmental enquiry proceedings. 9. The enquiry proceedings are vitiated and hence the impugned orders cannot be sustained. The order of the appellate authority fares no better, inasmuch as, it fails to redeem the illegality committed by the impugned order of dismissal. 10. In this wake, the impugned order dated 01.01.2024 passed by the respondent No.3 and the order dated 24.08.2024 passed by the respondent No.2 are liable to be set aside and are set aside. 11. The matter is remitted to the respondents authority with the following directions:- i) The petitioner shall be given list of departmental witnesses who are proposed to be examined and also provided with copies of adverse materials which are to be relied upon against him. ii) The enquiry officer shall set specific dates for the enquiry proceedings and intimate the same to the petitioner in advance thereof. iii) The department shall produce relevant departmental witnesses in the enquiry proceedings. The petitioner shall be given an opportunity to cross-examine the said witnesses. iv). All other dues and entitlements of the petitioner shall be determined after the result of the enquiry proceedings. v). The enquiry officer is directed to expedite the enquiry proceedings expeditiously considering the fact that the petitioner is likely to retire soon. The petitioner shall also cooperate in the enquiry proceedings. 13.
Writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated above.
Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Ashish Tripathi Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad