Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9264 (GAU)

PANKAJ PAREEK @ PANKAJ SARMA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 2 ORS.

Crl.Pet./994/2017 · 2025-04-03

Kaushik Goswami

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010055252017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./994/2017 PANKAJ PAREEK @ PANKAJ SARMA S/O BHISHMA DEV PAREEK, R/O H.NO. 41, PRAGJYOTISH PATH, SANTIPUR HILLSIDE, GUWAHATI 781009 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 2 ORS. 2:DEBOJIT CHETIA INFORMANT LEGAL ADVISER OF VINAYAK CEMENT GROUND FLOOR SHIVAM COMPLEX BHARALUMUKH GUWAHATI-781009 ASSAM 3:VINAYAK CEMENT GROUND FLOOR SHIVAM COMPLEX BHARALUMUKH GUWAHATI-781009 ASSAM REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR KUNAL MITTA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.M J GOGOI, MR.A K DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. R J SARMA,MR. R DE Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 04.04.2025 Heard Mr. H. Bora, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. None appears for the respondent No. 2 on call. Mr. H. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the criminal petition, the petitioner has expired and hence, the petition has become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid endorsement, the criminal petition stands dismissed on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant