HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13230 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner and Ms. Archana Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned counsel for respondents. 2. It is not under much dispute that there is a dispute between petitioner and his brother for compassionate appointment, therefore, claim of petitioner at this stage cannot be considered and respondent cannot be directed to consider and pass an order, however, petitioner will have liberty that in case, the dispute is settled between him and his brother, he can again approach the concerned respondent, however, on that stage, the aspect of delay in approaching the concerned respondent for compassionate appointment will also be taken note of. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid observation. September 8, 2025 P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushil Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Srivastava (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Mohaneesh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad