Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92624 (ALL)

RANJIT YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/33999/2025 · 2025-09-07

Dinesh Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 33999 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard Sri Shams Tabrez Alam Ansari, learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. 2. The applicant has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the entire proceeding including charge sheet dated 05.09.2020 and NBW order dated 21.07.2025 in Session Case No. 211 of 2021 (State Vs. Ranjit Yadav), arising out of Case Crime No. 440 of 2020 under Sections 323, 504, 506, 392 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Madhuban, District Mau, pending before the court of Special Judge SC/ST Act, Mau. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that previously the applicant was enlarged on bail vide order dated 23.9.2020 passed by learned court below. However, at subsequent stage, due to some personal reasons he could not appear before the court below which led to issuance of non- bailable warrant against him vide order dated 8.5.2025. It is further submitted that applicant has never intended to avoid the court proceedings. It is further submitted that the applicant is ready and willing to cooperate with the court proceedings provided some protection may be accorded to him to appear before the court concerned and participate in the court proceedings. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in case protection is granted to the present applicant to enable him to appear before the court below to participate in the court proceedings. 5. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this application pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to decide Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shams Tabrez Alam Ansari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ranjit Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) the instant application finally, without entering into the merits of the case as averred in the instant application, with a direction that, in case, the present applicant appears/surrenders before the court concerned along with a certified copy of this order and move bail application within three weeks from today, same shall be considered and decided by the court concerned within a period of three weeks thereafter. 6. 6. For a period of six weeks or till the disposal of bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the present applicant in the aforementioned case. 7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the instant application is finally disposed off. September 8, 2025 vkg NA528 No. 33999 of 2025 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad