IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 179 SAO No. 44 of 2014 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- 25.07.2025 Shamsher Singh Saini ...Appellant Versus Mr. Man Mohan Goel and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Neeraj Goel, Advocate for Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate for respondent No. 1. *** HARKESH MANUJA , J. (Oral) 1. No one appears on behalf of the appellant. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent informs that vide order dated 03.12.2016 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Rohtak, the suit for partition pending between the parties has been dismissed under Order IX Rule 5 CPC. 2. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present appeal and the same is thus, disposed of. 3. In case the suit titled as ‘Shamsher Vs. Bharto Etc.’ 1092-15 is restored, the appellant shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present appeal. 4. All pending applications (if any) shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 25.07.2025 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2025.07.29 08:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment