HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No.1217 of 2025 Smt. Nandi Devi ...Petitioner Versus Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation and others ….Respondents Present: Mr. Rajat Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Adhikari Patni, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. N.S. Pundir, Advocate for the respondents. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral) By means of instant petition, the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- “(i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to call for the record of case and quash impugned recovery bill contain in Annexure no.2 to this writ petition. (ii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to refund the entire amount deducted/recovered from the amount of arrear of 7th pay commission of the husband of the petitioner. (iii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case. (iv) Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 04.04.2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in 2 Special Appeal No. 245 of 2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun and others and other connected matters. 4. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel. 5. Since the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 04.04.2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No. 245 of 2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun and others and other connected matters. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 22.07.2025 Jitendra