SUNIL KUMAR v. PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, PANIPAT AND ANR
CWP/26846/2025 · 2026-09-03
Kirti Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9261 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9261 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT SUNIL KUMAR
PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, PANIPAT AND ANOTHER
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Harman Bir Singh Juneja, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, DAG, Haryana,
Mr. R.B. Gupta, Advocate for respondent KIRTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)
For detailed judgment, see order of even date passed in connected CWP No.26744 of 2025, titled Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal another”.
2.
For the reasons connected case, the present writ petition is also dismissed in similar terms.
3.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
September 3, 2026 SwarnjitS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.26846 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 SUNIL KUMAR Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, PANIPAT AND ANOTHER
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Mr. Harman Bir Singh Juneja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, DAG, Haryana, Mr. R.B. Gupta, Advocate for respondent **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (ORAL) For detailed judgment, see order of even date passed in connected CWP No.26744 of 2025, titled Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum For the reasons recorded in the order passed today in the connected case, the present writ petition is also dismissed in similar terms. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. September 3, 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: Yes/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.26846 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 ....PETITIONER PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Mr. Harman Bir Singh Juneja, Advocate Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, DAG, Haryana, Mr. R.B. Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. For detailed judgment, see order of even date passed in connected CWP No.26744 of 2025, titled “Satyender Kumar Mahato v. cum-Labour Court, Panipat and recorded in the order passed today in the connected case, the present writ petition is also dismissed in similar terms. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE speaking/reasoned: Yes Yes/No
....PETITIONER LABOUR
....RESPONDENTS For detailed judgment, see order of even date passed in
“Satyender Kumar Mahato v. Labour Court, Panipat and recorded in the order passed today in the SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.09.08 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document