Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3365 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
2. By means of this application, the only prayer made by the applicant is that a direction be issued to the Judicial Magistrate-IInd , Mathura to decide the Complaint Case No. 9995 of 2021, (Smt. Sangita Devi Vs. Ajay Bhagat Singh Thakur), Under Section 138 N.I. Act, P.S.- Govind Nagar, District Mathura within a short stipulated period.
3. Considering the facts of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the applicant's case, this application U/s 529 B.N.S.S. is finally disposed of with a direction to the court below concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties as expeditiously as possible, if there is no legal impediment. September 16, 2025 A. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sharad Saran Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Smt. Sangita Devi .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad