Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:6638-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. ALOK MAHRA Writ Petition (S/B) No.307 of 2025 30th July, 2025
Saurabh Kushwaha
………..Petitioner Versus
State Of Uttarakhand and others …….Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Ms. Jasmeet Kaur proxy counsel for Mr. S.S. Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner. Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned Standing Counsel for the State. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT : (per Mr. G. Narendar C. J.)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2.
The learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on an order passed by this Bench while disposing of Writ Petition (S/B) No. 201 of 2025, wherein the petition was disposed of in the following terms:"
“4. In view of the above, we are of the opinion that the instant writ petition can be
disposed of by directing respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the instant writ petition as a representation and disposed of the same by a speaking order within an outer limit of six months.
5. The writ petition stands ordered accordingly.”
2025:UHC:6638-DB 2
3. Learned Standing Counsel would also consent to the same.
4.
In that view, the instant writ petition is
disposed of by directing the respondent nos. 2 & 3 to consider the instant writ petition as a representation and dispose of the same by a speaking order within an outer limit of six months.
5.
The writ petition stands ordered accordingly.
6.
There shall be no order as to costs.
7.
All accompanying applications stand
disposed of.
(G. NARENDAR, C. J.)
(ALOK MAHRA, J.) Dated: 30.07.2025 Mamta