RAGHAV PRATAP SINGH AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/20782/2025 · 2025-09-15
Salil Kumar Rai, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92579 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92579 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20782 of 2025 Court No. - 45 HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. List has been revised. No one appears for the petitioners. The present petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs :-
"I. Issue a writ order or direction in nature of certiorari and quashing the impugned first information report dated 10.08.2025 lodged by Respondent no. 4/Informant namely Sharda Devi Wife of Raju Nath (i.e., Son of Vijay Nath) against 4 persons namely Raghav Pratap Singh Son of Amar Singh Thakur, Ajay Pratap Singh Son of Amar Singh Thakur, Raju Nath Son of Heera Nath alias Shankar Nath and Saniya alias Sanya Wife of Raju Nath (i.e., Son of Heera Nath alias Shankar Nath) in Case Crime No. 0173 of 2025 under section 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 131, 352, 351(2) and 3(1)(द) S.C. & S.T. Act Police Station Indergarh District Kannauj. II. Issue a writ order or direction in nature of Mandamus commanding Respondent no. 2, 3 and 4, not to harass or arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned first information report dated 10.08.2025 lodged by Respondent no. 4/Informant namely Sharda Devi Wife of Raju Nath (i.e., Son of Vijay Nath) against 4 persons namely Raghav Pratap Singh Son of Amar Singh Thakur, Ajay Pratap Singh Son of Amar Singh Thakur, Raju Nath Son of Heera Nath alias Shankar Nath and Saniya alias Sanya Wife of Raju Nath (i.e., Son of Heera Nath alias Shankar Nath) in Case Crime No. 0173 of 2025 under section 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 131, 352, 351(2) and 3(1)(द) S.C. & S.T. Act Police Station Indergarh District Kannauj." A perusal of the First Information Report discloses commission of cognizable offence in the above case. In view of the aforesaid, no case for quashing the first information report is made out. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Prakash Pandey, Rochak Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinav Dwivedi, C.S.C. Raghav Pratap Singh And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
For the aforesaid reason, the present writ petition is dismissed. September 16, 2025 Satyam CRLP No. 20782 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Salil Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYAM AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad